ABSTRACT
Introducción: Las últimas evidencias revelan que la infección por COVID-19 no tienen peor pronóstico en los pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias inmunomediadas (EIMI), aunque desarrollan menor respuesta a la vacunación. Objetivo: Comparar la incidencia de COVID-19 y características clínicas en pacientes con EIMI entre la primera y sexta olas. Método: Estudio observacional prospectivo de 2 cohortes de pacientes con EIMI diagnosticados de COVID-19. Primera cohorte: marzo-mayo de 2020; segunda cohorte: diciembre/2021 a febrero/2022. Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas y clínicas, y en la segunda cohorte el estado de vacunación contra la COVID-19. El análisis estadístico estableció las diferencias de las características y la evolución clínica entre ambas cohortes. Resultados: De un total de 1.627 pacientes en seguimiento, contrajeron COVID-19 durante la primera ola 77 (4,60%) y 184 en la sexta (11,3%). En la sexta hubo menos hospitalizaciones, ingresos en cuidados intensivos y fallecimientos que en la primera (p=0,000) y 180 pacientes (97,8%) tenían al menos una dosis de vacuna. Conclusión: La detección precoz y la vacunación han evitado la aparición de complicaciones graves.(AU)
Introduction: Recent evidence shows that COVID-19 infection does not have a worse prognosis in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), although they develop a worse response to vaccination. Objective:To compare the incidence of COVID-19 and clinical features in patients with IMID between the first and sixth waves. Method: Prospective observational study of two cohorts of IMID patients diagnosed with COVID-19. First cohort March to May 2020, and second cohort December/2021 to February/2022. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected and, in the second cohort, COVID-19 vaccination status. Statistical analysis established differences in characteristics and clinical course between the two cohorts. Results: In total, 1627 patients were followed up, of whom 77 (4.60%) contracted COVID-19 during the first wave and 184 in the sixth wave (11.3%). In the sixth wave, there were fewer hospitalisations, intensive care unit admissions, and deaths than in the first wave (P=.000) and 180 patients (97.8%) had at least one dose of vaccine. Conclusion: Early detection and vaccination have prevented the occurrence of serious complications.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Chronic Disease/prevention & control , Vaccination , Nurse Clinicians , /epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Incidence , Epidemiology, DescriptiveABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence shows that COVID-19 infection does not have a worse prognosis in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), although they develop a worse response to vaccination. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of COVID-19 and clinical features in patients with IMID between the first and sixth waves. METHOD: Prospective observational study of two cohorts of IMID patients diagnosed with COVID-19. First cohort March to May 2020, and second cohort December/2021 to February/2022. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected and, in the second cohort, COVID-19 vaccination status. Statistical analysis established differences in characteristics and clinical course between the two cohorts. RESULTS: In total, 1627 patients were followed up, of whom 77 (4.60%) contracted COVID-19 during the first wave and 184 in the sixth wave (11.3%). In the sixth wave, there were fewer hospitalisations, intensive care unit admissions, and deaths than in the first wave (p=.000) and 180 patients (97.8%) had at least one dose of vaccine. CONCLUSION: Early detection and vaccination have prevented the occurrence of serious complications.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Pandemics , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/epidemiology , HospitalizationABSTRACT
Introduction: The internet is emerging as a source of information for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, it is not always reliable and may cause anxiety. We aim to assess patients' information habits and patients' and professionals' perceptions of a national website integrated as an educational resource for the IBD unit. Methods: Patients aged 18-65 years, comfortable with the internet, and attending follow-ups at participating IBD units (March-June 2019) and their professionals were invited to evaluate a recommended website through an online survey. Results: Three hundred eighty-nine patients and 95 professionals completed the survey. The internet (n = 109; 27.4%) was the second preferred source of information after the health care team (n = 229; 57.5%). Eighty percent of patients searched the internet for information on their disease and 28.6% did so at least once a week (n = 114), especially newly diagnosed ones (<2 years). Patients valued a website recommended by their professional (n = 379; 95.2%) and endorsed by the National Working Group (n = 377; 94.7%). They would attend online educational initiatives on the website (n = 279; 70.1%) and complete periodical surveys to improve its usefulness (n = 338; 84.9%). According to IBD professionals, this type of website is the best patient source of supplementary information (n = 76; 80%) and they "prescribe" it to most patients (67.0 ± 25.2%), especially the newly diagnosed patients (52.7 ± 26.5%). It effectively integrates routine face-to-face education (n = 95; 100%). Conclusions: Patients of IBD units, especially newly diagnosed ones, appreciate a trusted e-Health resource to back up professional information. The favorable opinion of patients and professionals will allow its use in training interventions.
